Slicing through the sky,
soaring knives snatch
and grind it into
a thin electric
If they could
Sunday, October 22, 2006
It's been a very busy week. Last monday Fred flew into town, so we spent a lot of time showing him around (and eating good food!). On Thursday we drove down to Iowa to get ready for my mom's birthday. On the way, we picked up my sister Maria and her baby Maia. They were a surprise and I think mom really enjoyed it. On Friday, Jason and I spent most of the day in the kitchen making big pans of lasagne and all the fixings. It was fun. Here are pictures, selected by Eikon.
Here's a picture of the kitchen/dining room. I'm not sure why Jason took it. It's not very good. The two ladies are mom's sisters. They look annoyed.
This picture is of a tractor pulling corn on the way home. We thought it might amuse you east-coasters.
Here is my lovely mother in her red hat.
Here are her old fart sandals.
Here's my mom with Maia.
Maia liked Eli a lot.
Maia's first piano lesson
Boy does she love it.
Mom gave jason this dutch oven as a thank you for dinner. It's huge!
Here are the big kids enjoying the birthday dinner.
Grandma, Maia, and Eli - trio in crime.
We found a sculpture of a dog with his leg lifted when we were in Des Moines. I thought we would reinact is with our puppy. The Photographer didn't do a good job.
Here's a cute picture of Eli. Eikon was too lazy to flip it so just turn your head.
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Tonight: Flurries and a few snow showers throughout the night. Cold. Low 21F. Winds WNW at 10 to 15 mph. Chance of snow 30%.
Tomorrow: Mostly cloudy and windy. Snow flurries and a few snow showers. High 38F. Winds WNW at 25 to 35 mph. Chance of snow 30%. Winds could occasionally gust over 40 mph.
The next day: Cloudy and blustery with snow showers. Low 29F. Winds W at 20 to 30 mph. Chance of snow 50%.
Welcome to Minne-f*ing-sota. Enjoy your stay.
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
I recently read on Dan Vera's blog:
The conservative writer Andrew Sullivan ticks me off at times (too long to go into detail here) but he does hit the nail on the head at times:
If the Foley incident is not about pedophilia, it is also not, it seems to me, about homosexuality. It's fundamentally about the closet. The closet is so psychologically destructive it often produces pathological behavior. When you compartmentalize your life, you sometimes act out in one compartment in ways that you would never condone in another one. Think Clinton-Lewinsky, in a heterosexual context. But closeted gay men are particularly vulnerable to this kind of thing. Your psyche is so split by decades of lies and deceptions and euphemisms that integrity and mental health suffer. No one should excuse Foley's creepy interactions; they are inexcusable, as is the alleged cover-up (although we shouldn't jump to conclusions yet about who knew what when). But there's a reason gay men in homophobic institutions behave in self-destructive ways.
Or think of it another way: what do the
The parallels are looking a little creepy. And the source is the same.
To which I responded:
I can't say I like this. Let's not forget all the issues about which Vatican DISSAGREES with Republicans. Of course Sullivan has a right to comment, but I think he should brush up on his psychology first. He comes to some pretty grandiose unstudied conclusions here. Do you really believe this? Being part of an intensely homophobic institution some how messes you up, and inspires you to do such naughty things? I don't.
To which Bo of WhiteCrane responded:
"John Mark, I have to say I really don't understand YOUR response here. I find nothing grandiose in Sullivan's conclusions...they're fairly obvious, if anything. And believe it? What's not to believe? That there isn't entrenched homophobia in the Catholic Church? In the Republican Party? That either aren't teeming with psychologically damaged closet cases? Surely not that there hasn't been inappropriate behavior with teens and minors. And when it comes to cover ups designed entirely to retain power, the Catholic Church wrote the book...and, let's be honest here, not just when speaking of inappropriate sexual activities."
Actually Bo, in my response, when I was talking about "Grandiose Conclusions." I was referring to Sullivan's conclusion that intensely homophobic institutions create closet case sociopaths. There are a whole lot of people who (most unfortunately) live much of their lives in the closet. They don't lust after little boys or flirt with teenagers online. If and when they do come out (thank god!) a hefty majority of them live completely normal gay lives - not being sociopaths or sexual predators. I guess I don't like the "homophobic institution + gay man = sexual predators" assumption. I also don't think it's fair for you or Sullivan to say that either the Roman Catholic Church or the Republican Party (may they be destroyed) are teaming with psychologically damaged closet-cases. I don't know the GOP but I DO know the catholic church, and I think for every gay priest who becomes a sexual predator as a result of being a closetcase, there are probably another 200 gay priests who struggle with their sexuality no more than the straight ones. I'm not defending the celibacy requirement - I'm just observing the church where it is at now.
"Looking for where the Catholic Church "disagrees" with the
It's funny, Bo, that I know so much about you, but you know so little about myself. I am a cradle democrat Roman Catholic (remember, there was a time when most Catholics were all democrats, now it is split down the middle), who holds a lot of hope for the church. For me being Catholic is such a part of my identity, so much that to renounce it would be to renounce my Irish or German heritage. Does a liberal southerner renounce and reject beloved ancestors because they were racist, or does he accept them for what there worth and work for change and open-mindedness in the world? Hopefully the latter. I work for the church, and even though I'm considering leaving the church for better job security, I will never be able to get rid of my religious heritage. There is a reason that most "fallen away" Methodists, when asked, won't say "I don't go to church but I used to be a Methodist", where as a catholic would say "I'm catholic but I don't go to church anymore."
Fortunately for me, I was not raised with "catholic baggage" and never felt oppressed and forced into the closet by my family's religious beliefs. I approached Catholicism from a different place, which somehow manages to paint the picture much clearer. It allows me to see the church, as a diverse collection of people who have G-d within them, just as he abides in me. The people of god are the church, and thus the bride of Christ, not the pope (although I'd love to see him in wedding drag). I don't fight the church, I challenge the hierarchy which is clearly not "the church".
Are you honestly contending that being a part of an intensely homophobic institution DOESN'T mess you up? Can't mess you up? Would never inspire (and I'm not sure that's the right word choice...more like "infect") you to do naughty things? Really? Are you kidding? Ever? Does the term "herd mentality" mean anything to you? You know, like "the flock" and "sheep"? I think it's grandiose to excuse it. And possibly a little self-serving.
I would admit that a being part of a homophobic institution can mess one up, but it doesn't NECESSARILY nor abundantly. Psychological disorders happen across the bored in every community.
The Catholic Church hasn't infected me, or messed me up in any negative way. I hold it close to my heart. This isn't like holding the republican party close to one's heart. I see my church as being heavily faulted, but all together focussed on love and service. I see the most republicans as selfish, close-minded bigots.
I've had a largely possitive experience with Catholicism. I think anyone can have that experience if they focus on the localized, ritual actions that take place, and worry less about the politics of the Roman Curia.
People who know me, would know that I have issues when people make generalizations, especially when they make them with express certainty. That really bothers me, from a liberal or a conservative.
Sunday, October 08, 2006
So we went to Woodcutters ever so briefly with Elias who seemed to really enjoy kawashaway. We had lovely conversation with Kiva and to a little walk along the temperance where we promptly lost our gentle leader dog leash. I decided to come home with Flopper rather than have him drive the 2 hours to Duluth to get me on Monday and because I had work on Monday. Getting home and checking my messages I found that I no longer have work on Moday as they have decided to let me go. I kept forgetting (twice) to initial for eyedrops and foot cream and apparantly company policy is strict about these things. So back to the job hunt. It seems I have a comission for a hat and Flopper's sister in law Terri has informed me e of a craft show that she holds and suggested I might do eggs. I could probably put together a few dozen ormnament quality eggs before then but haven't decided whether it would be cost effective. 40 hours of labour with 30 percent of the take being given to the house and maybe 50 dollars of supplies. I could make maybe 300 . Oh well it is something to ponder. I am currently working on a baby blamket, a scarf, and two pairs of socks.
Monday, October 02, 2006
Two humorous incidents.
So as Flopper is lifting Eli into the the air after singing to him in an attempt to encourage him to do jazz paws he says to me.
"Wouldn't it be weird if there were creatures with dog-like intelligence that walked on their hind legs ? You know like Wookies"
To which I indignantly reply. "Chewbacca was 200 years old and a mechanical genius."
"Well why doesn't he speak?"
"Because he doesn't have the right shaped vocal chords and the Wookies are a proud people. He speaks Wookie."
"He could at least speak in morse code. Ahh ah ah Ahh ah ah. If wookies are in my country, they should speak my language. What next? Signs in the grocery store in Wookie?"